Commentary for Bava Batra 199:4
אי הכי אמאי אמר רבה בר רב הונא אמר רב אין הלכה כר"א מאן דמתני הא לא מתני הא
If so,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That, according to Rab, the case dealt with by R. Eliezer is that of recovering a lost path. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> why did Rabbah, son of R. Huna, state in the name of Rab [that] the <i>halachah</i> is not according to R. Eliezer?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Surely, the public are entitled to reclaim what they have lost. How, then, are the two statements made in the name of Rab to be reconciled? ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 199:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.